{"id":2865,"date":"2024-09-26T16:37:01","date_gmt":"2024-09-26T14:37:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ireform.eu\/?post_type=publikacja&p=2865"},"modified":"2026-06-15T23:12:04","modified_gmt":"2026-06-15T21:12:04","slug":"a-new-network-tariff-model-as-the-key-to-cheaper-energy-and-a-sustainable-transition-2","status":"publish","type":"publikacja","link":"https:\/\/ireform.eu\/en\/publikacja\/a-new-network-tariff-model-as-the-key-to-cheaper-energy-and-a-sustainable-transition-2\/","title":{"rendered":"A new network tariff model as the key to cheaper energy and a sustainable transition"},"content":{"rendered":"

The transformation of Poland’s power grids requires investments of PLN 500 billion by 2040. Flexible demand management will reduce these costs, which will translate into lower electricity bills. According to the Reform Institute in its new report titled Fixed, variable, or perhaps dynamic? Network charges in the face of energy transformation<\/strong><\/em>, for this to happen, a change in the approach to network charges is\u00a0required, which should reflect the\u00a0real costs\u00a0of the system.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The dynamic development of wind and photovoltaic sources, as well as the ongoing electrification of transport and heating, create an urgent need to expand and modernize power grids. The current transmission and distribution infrastructure, designed for large coal-fired power plants, is not adapted to the distributed renewable energy sources that power an electrified economy. A modernized grid will not only enable the further development of\u00a0RES, but\u00a0also meet growing consumer demand.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

There is much to fight for \u2013 more efficient use of infrastructure will accelerate the transition to cheaper renewable\u00a0sources and reduce the cost of building new networks. In practice, this means lower energy bills for consumers and the\u00a0economy as a whole.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Klaudia Janik,\u00a0Climate and\u00a0Energy\u00a0Policy\u00a0Analyst\u00a0at the Reform Institute,\u00a0highlights:<\/strong>
\n<\/span>The value of investments ensuring the necessary network capacity depends on peak electricity demand. That is why it is important to smooth out the electricity consumption profile of end users, especially in households. If consumers start using energy when there is a lot of it in the system and it is cheapest – for example, by running a washing machine, heat pump, charging an electric car, or energy storage – they will not only lower their bills, but also reduce peak demand. Such optimization of consumption and greater flexibility will allow for more efficient use of funds for network development. In other words, implementing network usage billing that better reflects the actual situation in the energy system will allow us to integrate distributed renewable sources, electric car charging stations, and heat pumps into the energy system more quickly at more attractive energy prices.<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

However, achieving these benefits requires a change in approach to network charges. In the future, they should better reflect the actual costs of infrastructure in our bills. Lower bills will only be possible if we reduce the costs of the system instead of artificially freezing them.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Aleksander \u015aniegocki, President of the Reform Institute, says:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>Moving away from the outdated approach to network charges in\u00a0favor\u00a0of\u00a0new solutions, such as dynamic charges\u00a0or flexibility services, will require technical, organizational, and communication efforts. That is why it is important to have\u00a0a common understanding of the need for change and the long-term benefits of moving in this direction. The Reform Institute therefore recommends launching a nationwide discussion on modernizing the way in which the costs of using the power grid are settled.<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Dynamic tariffs for electricity purchases are currently mainly\u00a0indicated\u00a0among the tools used to increase the flexibility of electricity consumers. Although they have\u00a0great potential\u00a0to activate end users, they\u00a0also\u00a0have certain\u00a0limitations. On\u00a0the one\u00a0hand,\u00a0they accurately reflect the balance of energy supply and demand across the entire power system, but on the other hand, they are unable to signal local network bottlenecks, e.g.,\u00a0indicate\u00a0clusters of power consumption points in areas with\u00a0low RES\u00a0concentration. Problems with local network congestion, which occur\u00a0regularly,\u00a0 e.g., during peak power demand in the afternoon, could be reflected in a dynamic distribution tariff for consumers\u00a0in a given\u00a0area. In the case of sudden, spontaneous overloads, a solution should be\u00a0sought\u00a0in the flexibility services offered to distribution system operators (DSOs).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Given\u00a0the significant potential to reduce the costs of the energy transition by increasing demand-side flexibility and implementing\u00a0appropriate network\u00a0tariff solutions, the Reform Institute recommends:\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n